English: Bean order.
DD:
Phase 5,
Phosphorus, Nitrogen;
Carbon series;
Silicon series;
Iron series.
Families in Fabales1.
Polygalaceae, including Surianceae and
Quillajaceae 2. Galegoioideae, subfamily of
Papilionoideae3.
Phaseoloideae, subfamily of
Papilionoideae4.
Genistoideae, subfamily of
Papilionoideae5.
Mimosoideae, subfamily of
Fabaceae6.
Caesalpinioideae, subfamily of
Fabaceae7.
Zygophyllaceae, including
Krameriaceae TaxonomyFabales is one of the Orders in
Fabidae, part of the Nitrogen‑fixing clade. The Order of the
Fabales in the
Apg3 classification consists of
Fabaceae,
Polygalaceae, Suraniaceae and
Quillajaceae.
Plant theory 2In the
Plant theory Fabales is placed in
Phase 5.
Polygalaceae has shown strong aspects of
Phase 1 and is now placed in
Subphase 1, together with
Surianaceae and
Quillajaceae.
Quillajaceae is a family with only genus, Quillaja. It was once thought to be in the rose family,
Rosaceae. At the moment it is difficult to place.
The
Fabaceae has been split into its 5 subfamilies.
Mimosoideae and
Caesalpinioideae remain subfamilies in the
Plant theory 2, but are shifted to
Subphase 5 and
Subphase 6 respectively. This fits the homeopathic qualities better.
Papilionoideae was placed in
Subphase 5 in
Plant theory 1. It contains the majority of genera of the
Fabaceae. In
Plant theory 2 Papilionoideae is split in Galegoioideae,
Phaseoloideae and
Genistoideae, respectively placed in the
Subphases 2, 3 and 4. This fits the homeopathic information in a better way. For instance many remedies in
Galegoioideae have chronic fatigue syndrome, which fits the inadequate, weak aspect of
Phase 2.
The
Zygophyllales, containing the families
Zygophyllaceae and
Krameriaceae, has been included in
Fabales. The single genus family
Krameriaceae is included in
Zygophyllaceae.
Zygophyllaceae is placed in
Subphase 7. Krameria, in homeopathy known as, in palced in
Stage 17.
CommentThe classification of Fables has been problematic. The first hurdle was to include
Zygophyllales in
Fabales, which make
Fabales not monphyletic. But it has turned out to work well.
The second problem was the split of
Fabaceae. The classical split in subfamilies is in
Caesalpinioideae,
Mimosoideae and
Papilionoideae. But DNA analyses have shown that
Caesalpinioideae is not monophyletic, including all the early diverging clades of
Fabaceae.
The third problem was to merge
Polygalaceae and
Surianaceae in
Subphase 1. We still know little of
Surianaceae in homeopathy.
The last problem was to split
Papilionoideae into Galegoioideae,
Phaseoloideae and
Genistoideae. Especially probelematic is
Genistoideae as it is not monophyletic.
Comparison of
Plant theory 1 and
Plant theory 2 N Remedy code
Plant theory 1
Plant theory 2 0. 3-644.50.00
Fabales Fabales1. 3-644.51.00
Polygalaceae Surianceae
2. 3-644.52.00 Galegoioideae
Polygalaceae3. 3-644.53.00
Phaseoloideae Mimosoideae4. 3-644.54.00
Genistoideae Caesalpinioideae5. 3-644.55.00
Mimosoideae Papilionoideae6. 3-644.56.00
Caesalpinioideae Zygophyllaceae7. 3-644.57.00
Zygophyllaceae Krameriaceae LiteratureBello, M A & others; Elusive Relationships Within Order
Fabales: Phylogenetic Analyses Using matK and rbcL Sequence Data; Systematic
Botany (2009), 34(1): pp. 102–114; 2009.
Bello, M A & others; Combined phylogenetic analyses reveal interfamilial relationships and patterns of floral evolution in the eudicot order
Fabales; Cladistics 28 (2012) 393–421; 10.1111; j.1096-0031.2012.00392.